Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Mate X2: Huawei (still) does it better
7 months after it was released, the Huawei Mate X2 still looks like a next-gen device next to Samsung’s Z Fold 3, which isn’t all that different from the Z Fold 2.
Unfortunately, that’s about where the meaningful upgrades end. So, let’s bring back the Huawei Mate X2 and put Samsung on the spot (again). Before doing so, just like in the June story, let’s clarify that a comparison between the two isn’t particularly valid since the Mate X2 doesn’t run Google apps out of the box; costs much more than the Z Fold 3, and it’s hard to get – we blame the US trade ban.
- Has larger, better displays – especially the outer one
- Pretty much solves the “crease issue” when unfolded
- Comes with a way better, truly flagship-grade set of cameras
- Much faster charging
- And have you seen the GENIUS design move that allows the Mate X2 to fold without leaving a gap?!
It’s easy to see…
What’s shocking here is that the above is a direct quote from our Mate X2 vs Galaxy Z Fold 2 story. In other words, in an attempt to make the Galaxy Z Fold 3 cheaper (-$200), Samsung has completely overlooked the basics of a good smartphone and an excellent foldable… again.
- The outer screen is still awkwardly sized, encouraging you to use the inner display as soon as possible. However, then you open it, and it’s really… not that big. Look a bit closer, and the crease from the original Galaxy Fold and Z Fold 2 is still there.
- Try taking photos, and you’ll realize that the Galaxy Z Fold 3 comes with the same main and ultra-wide cameras from the Galaxy S20 and the exact same 2x zoom camera from (attention!) the Galaxy S10. Now, that’s what we call a sacrifice for reaching a specific price point. We are sure Samsung has worked on the software side of the camera experience to manage to squeeze the most out of those dated sensors, but it’s still insane to think you’re paying $1600 (!!!) for a set of mid-range cameras. And that’s not even taking into account the new 4MP under-display camera that (sadly) rivals laptop cams in terms of quality.
- Try charging your Galaxy Z Fold 3, and you’ll find out that it charges just as slow as any other Galaxy flagship. That’s actually a problem with Samsung’s entire flagship lineup, so we are willing to give it a pass. Although, again – $1600…
- And finally, the design of the phone remains virtually untouched – slightly lighter thanks to the smaller battery (2% smaller), and with the same gap when closed – just like in the good old-Fold days.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3: Cheaper, but also… cheaper
The under-display camera clearly wasn’t ready. But Samsung was.
Congrats, Samsung! You did it. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is now cheaper. But the price cut doesn’t feel like magic as it does with Xiaomi’s Mi Mix Fold, for example. This device can be imported for £1084 in the UK and Europe (12GB RAM/256GB storage) as of today, which makes it cheaper than Samsung’s Galaxy S21 Ultra, and Apple’s iPhone 12 Pro Max for reference.
Samsung’s phone is now cheaper, but it remains expensive. Yet, it carries iterative improvements over the Galaxy Z Fold 2. If it was an iPhone, it would have been an “S” model. Who knows – maybe Samsung’s only motivation to make a great foldable will be if Apple entered the game. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem like Cupertino wants to play. We won’t be surprised if Apple moves straight to a different form factor like a rollable phone. God knows when… Well, perhaps, Tim Cook does too.
Still, my impressions are, well… only first impressions. Therefore, come back for our full review of the Galaxy Z Fold 3. And hey – even with the compromises Samsung had to make, the Z Fold 3 is still better than the Z Fold 2. Also, chances are it’s the only foldable tablet-phone available in your region, and therefore the best one.
Good job, Samsung, but you can do better…